<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Almost Elegant No.2b</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/</link>
	<description>Indie MP3 blog mostly rock, pop, folk and electronic</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Almost Elegant No.4c - 2007 at motel de moka</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-110857</link>
		<dc:creator>Almost Elegant No.4c - 2007 at motel de moka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-110857</guid>
		<description>[...] see also: No.2b, No.3a-2006, Moka’s top 12 albums 2007. image: only alice , ilmungo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see also: No.2b, No.3a-2006, Moka’s top 12 albums 2007. image: only alice , ilmungo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Almost Elegant no.3a-2006 at motel de moka</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-5612</link>
		<dc:creator>Almost Elegant no.3a-2006 at motel de moka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-5612</guid>
		<description>[...] see also: AE no.2b image: MaD Gi®L•™ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see also: AE no.2b image: MaD Gi®L•™ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Makrugaik</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-3573</link>
		<dc:creator>Makrugaik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-3573</guid>
		<description>That Jon. He being facetious. Don't know him from a bar of soap, but that I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Jon. He being facetious. Don&#8217;t know him from a bar of soap, but that I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moka</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-3572</link>
		<dc:creator>Moka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-3572</guid>
		<description>Hey squashed, I agree with john, just quote some Bataille and you wont go wrong :)
The fortin-leveille link was wrong so I edited it. Nice songs btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey squashed, I agree with john, just quote some Bataille and you wont go wrong :)<br />
The fortin-leveille link was wrong so I edited it. Nice songs btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squashed</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-3571</link>
		<dc:creator>Squashed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-3571</guid>
		<description>jon the revelator said... 

Your lead singer has a nice voice. 

(The heavy Metallica influence is a bit too common tho', as if the entire process is feeding a series of predetermined 'I am dark and tough' thought production. But the idioms is too common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jon the revelator said&#8230; </p>
<p>Your lead singer has a nice voice. </p>
<p>(The heavy Metallica influence is a bit too common tho&#8217;, as if the entire process is feeding a series of predetermined &#8216;I am dark and tough&#8217; thought production. But the idioms is too common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squashed</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-3570</link>
		<dc:creator>Squashed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-3570</guid>
		<description>absolutely, unless you are talking about some telepathic creature, almost all of us 'see' other first as condition of perception. Then come the 'knowing', the interplay of consent, and hence the game of desire.

I doubt by quoting bataille, everybody will love me, not around the postmodern circle at least. Life is more complicated than simply being 'shocking' or stylistic existential despair.

I for one think, the interplays and drama in between are all the rage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absolutely, unless you are talking about some telepathic creature, almost all of us &#8217;see&#8217; other first as condition of perception. Then come the &#8216;knowing&#8217;, the interplay of consent, and hence the game of desire.</p>
<p>I doubt by quoting bataille, everybody will love me, not around the postmodern circle at least. Life is more complicated than simply being &#8217;shocking&#8217; or stylistic existential despair.</p>
<p>I for one think, the interplays and drama in between are all the rage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon the revelator</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-3569</link>
		<dc:creator>jon the revelator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 04:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2006/01/27/almost-elegant-no2b/#comment-3569</guid>
		<description>that's really a more a definition of the erotic aspect of voyeurism than the conditions of 'erotic' dont you think?

and anyway, are the frenchies really necessary?

just quote some bataille.
then everybody love you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s really a more a definition of the erotic aspect of voyeurism than the conditions of &#8216;erotic&#8217; dont you think?</p>
<p>and anyway, are the frenchies really necessary?</p>
<p>just quote some bataille.<br />
then everybody love you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
