<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: System/Layers (Cinematic Hip-Hop, 2 a.m.)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/</link>
	<description>Indie MP3 blog mostly rock, pop, folk and electronic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:51:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: squashed</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/comment-page-1/#comment-58886</link>
		<dc:creator>squashed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/#comment-58886</guid>
		<description>hmmmm, 

There is also practical consideration. Balancing post link vs. full link everything. I can link every single words in a post to dictionary, wiki, etc. But in the end nobody is going to click it and nobody will even read the post. It&#039;s ugly.  And the point of giving credit (name, urging people to trace back to original creator) is not achieved.

I can&#039;t help it if random clicker doesn&#039;t read credit and has no interest tracing back original work. I usually just point out image credit politely. If he is still whining second time afterward, permanent ban. I have no time dealing with idiots who doesn&#039;t read. (It happens several time, you can search comment section.)

Any creator of original work can request take down. We have 2 records label so far asking for take down. No image creators, since I give credits, license is compatible, and I use &quot;icons&quot;. 

Anyway. Anybody else would have used full size image, loading up on different server, maybe resize it and not giving link/credit.   You wouldn&#039;t have known your picture is being used even after using ice rocket last nite, because there is no registered link for any searched engine to trace back.   A link inside &quot;icon&quot; won&#039;t get associated with &quot;keywords/author&quot; too. 

Overall, I think this gives everybody the most. I spread the use of creative commons, authors gets credit via search engine, readers can see the most important information.

sq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmmm, </p>
<p>There is also practical consideration. Balancing post link vs. full link everything. I can link every single words in a post to dictionary, wiki, etc. But in the end nobody is going to click it and nobody will even read the post. It&#8217;s ugly.  And the point of giving credit (name, urging people to trace back to original creator) is not achieved.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help it if random clicker doesn&#8217;t read credit and has no interest tracing back original work. I usually just point out image credit politely. If he is still whining second time afterward, permanent ban. I have no time dealing with idiots who doesn&#8217;t read. (It happens several time, you can search comment section.)</p>
<p>Any creator of original work can request take down. We have 2 records label so far asking for take down. No image creators, since I give credits, license is compatible, and I use &#8220;icons&#8221;. </p>
<p>Anyway. Anybody else would have used full size image, loading up on different server, maybe resize it and not giving link/credit.   You wouldn&#8217;t have known your picture is being used even after using ice rocket last nite, because there is no registered link for any searched engine to trace back.   A link inside &#8220;icon&#8221; won&#8217;t get associated with &#8220;keywords/author&#8221; too. </p>
<p>Overall, I think this gives everybody the most. I spread the use of creative commons, authors gets credit via search engine, readers can see the most important information.</p>
<p>sq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/comment-page-1/#comment-58779</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 07:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/#comment-58779</guid>
		<description>Haha.  Sorry.   Posted to quickly.  I now see the attribution at the very bottom.  Thanks!  (though FYI most flickr photographers would probably appreciate the thumbnails being linked too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha.  Sorry.   Posted to quickly.  I now see the attribution at the very bottom.  Thanks!  (though FYI most flickr photographers would probably appreciate the thumbnails being linked too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/comment-page-1/#comment-58776</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 07:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/#comment-58776</guid>
		<description>I enjoy that you like my photos and thought to include them to accompany your posting.  But my creative commons license specifically requests attribution for uses like this.  Please either include my name or have the thumbnails link to their originating flickr pages.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy that you like my photos and thought to include them to accompany your posting.  But my creative commons license specifically requests attribution for uses like this.  Please either include my name or have the thumbnails link to their originating flickr pages.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cinematic Hip-Hop (Jazzy Drift in Tokyo) at motel de moka</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/comment-page-1/#comment-35852</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinematic Hip-Hop (Jazzy Drift in Tokyo) at motel de moka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 06:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/#comment-35852</guid>
		<description>[...] see also: System/Layers, happiness image by: TommyOshima, TommyOshima [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see also: System/Layers, happiness image by: TommyOshima, TommyOshima [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/comment-page-1/#comment-35083</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 21:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/#comment-35083</guid>
		<description>Thanks for turning me onto Sara Tavares. She is great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for turning me onto Sara Tavares. She is great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fk</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/comment-page-1/#comment-34523</link>
		<dc:creator>fk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 20:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/#comment-34523</guid>
		<description>i am looking forward to the downtempo list</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am looking forward to the downtempo list</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squashed</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/comment-page-1/#comment-34493</link>
		<dc:creator>squashed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 19:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/#comment-34493</guid>
		<description>sarabande is a dance music, albeit slow. (gigue and courante too) But to me, they are hardly danceable. (bop head and shake booty type of dance) Same with downtempo/IDM, they rooted in dance, but a lot of them are not danceable anymore.

AMM vs Samba is the most interesting tho&#039; They sit perfectly well next to each other. And danceable. (well, whatever dance means) But the rythm is there.

I have one more list. The last one is actually a normal downtempo stuff. (Probably I should lump them in lounge list instead. mmm...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sarabande is a dance music, albeit slow. (gigue and courante too) But to me, they are hardly danceable. (bop head and shake booty type of dance) Same with downtempo/IDM, they rooted in dance, but a lot of them are not danceable anymore.</p>
<p>AMM vs Samba is the most interesting tho&#8217; They sit perfectly well next to each other. And danceable. (well, whatever dance means) But the rythm is there.</p>
<p>I have one more list. The last one is actually a normal downtempo stuff. (Probably I should lump them in lounge list instead. mmm&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fk</title>
		<link>http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/comment-page-1/#comment-34450</link>
		<dc:creator>fk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 17:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moteldemoka.com/2007/05/19/systemlayers-cinematic-hip-hop-2-am/#comment-34450</guid>
		<description>this is an interesting way to mix Bach with electronics, my first choice when i try to think of the two at the same time is Wendy Carlos, but this list takes another direction</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is an interesting way to mix Bach with electronics, my first choice when i try to think of the two at the same time is Wendy Carlos, but this list takes another direction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

